According to the California Tort Claims Act (California Government Code sections 810 through 996.6), a public entity is not liable for an injury by the public entity or any of its employees. The rule of sovereign immunity is another name for this general rule. Though, the law also has certain limited exceptions that allow the State of California to face liability.

What Claims Can Have Coverage Under the California Tort Claims Act?

All actions against a public entity seeking money or damages must proceed a claim, unless the action is excluding:

• Medical negligence
• Car accidents
• Burn injuries
• Slip and fall accidents
• Bus accidents
• Nuisance
• Breach of contract
• Intentional wrongs

A government agency or entity is legally responsible for the negligent acts of its employees, in case they were acting in the scope of their employment and/or they were performing government function at the time of the accident happened. Under the California Tort Claims Act, the claimant has to file a claim with the entity or agency which employs the negligent employee. It is not permissible, according to CTCA, to file claims directly against the negligent party. In California, public entities can also be responsible for injuries caused by the negligence of their independent contractors.

Filing a Claim Under the California Tort Claims Act

The injury victim must give notice of his or her claim to the State of California, a county government, or a municipal government agency in order to file a claim against them. 6 This could include filing a report or sending a letter that serves as notice if it meets all of the necessary criteria. Many agencies and municipalities, on the other hand, have claim forms that individuals can fill out to notify them of a claim. The claim must include the following information:

• Claimant's name and mailing address
• Location, date, and description of the accident
• Description of the injury, loss, and damage
• The name of the responsible government employee (if known)
• The amount claimed and the basis of calculation in case the claim is under $10,000
• If the total amount is more than $10,000 the claim must show if it would be a limited civil case ($20,000 or less)

Your claim may be invalidated if you do not provide all of the required information. A claim may be denied if it is not filed properly within the time limit set by law.

Can a Government be Responsible for my Injures?

In certain circumstances, the government can be legally liable for personal injury damages under the Act. The following are examples of these scenarios:

• Employees' irresponsible behavior
• Independent contractors' irresponsible behavior
• Liability for hazardous conditions on government property
• When the failure of a public entity to carry out a legal duty results in damages

The government entity or agency that is responsible for the employee, property, or carrying out a duty in a California Tort Claims Act claim is usually the government entity or agency that is responsible for the employee, property, or carrying out a duty. The CTCA covers state, county, and local government agencies and departments, as well as city and municipal government agencies.

Statute of Limitations for Filing a Tort Claim in California

The majority of personal injury claims have a time limit for filing. However, the statute of limitations, or the amount of time you have to file a claim against a government entity, is usually shorter than the time you have to file a claim against a private party. For claims involving the following, a notice must be filed within six months:

• Personal injury
• Wrongful death
• Personal property damage
• Crop damage

The six-month period may not begin to run until the plaintiff discovers (or should have discovered) the injury in very limited circumstances. In a medical malpractice case, for example, the victim may not be aware of an accident or injury for weeks or months.

Glendale Personal Injury Attorney

If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of another's negligence, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

Who may be responsible for the Roof Accident in California?

Anyone who acts with negligence and causes harm to another, thus breaching their duty of care, may be liable for any damages under California law. If proven guilty, the following individuals or groups may be held accountable for a roofing accident: The Roofing firm, Property owner, Renter or landlord, Property manager, Neighbor, Construction company, Ladder manufacturer, Contractor or subcontractor, or Government agency. Even if the person who caused the accident had no prior knowledge of the damaged victim, he or she can be held liable for negligence that resulted in harm. Hiring a lawyer is usually the best option when determining somebody is accountable for damages in a roof fall accident.

How can a Person Prove who is responsible for a Roof Accident in California?

A party is held accountable for their actions or inactions that resulted in injury in a negligence lawsuit, however, in order to prove a party is accountable it must be proven. In the case of a roof fall accident what m00ust be proven is as follows:

• the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care,
• that the defendant breached that duty of care by negligent action or omission, and
• The defendant's carelessness was a material factor in causing harm or death to win a negligence claim.

Can I sue the Roofing Company for something that their employee has done in California?

An employer may be liable for damages caused by an employee's negligence under California's "respondeat superior" statutes. Accidents involving roofing can be catastrophic and may require costly medical treatment. If roofing installation is inadequate, it may lead to lengthy house repairs. Suing a roofing worker who may not have the money to pay for the damages may seem pointless to an accident victim, therefore, the injured party can pursue the employer (who is also likely to carry insurance).

Can the owner of the property be responsible for the Roofing Accident?

The property owner or occupant may be held accountable whenever a person falls off a roof due to hazardous circumstances on the roof. Property owners owe a duty of care to others on their property under California's premise liability rules. Property owners and occupants have a responsibility to keep the premises in a reasonably safe state. This includes a commitment to exercise reasonable caution in detecting any potentially hazardous conditions.

For More Questions Regarding Determining Liability in a Roof fall Accident

If you or someone you know has been injured in a roofing accident the attorneys at KAASS Law are ready to help you determine your options, please contact us at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

No driver, unfortunately, is insured against a car accident. After a car, truck, or motorcycle accident, drivers have several options for getting their compensation for vehicle repair. While the damaged vehicle is in the process of repairing, the at-fault driver or his or her insurer is also liable for the payment of renting a similar vehicle. However, just because another driver is at fault does not guarantee that the responsible party will pay up without a fight.

Who is Responsible for Paying Your Car Repair Bills?

The negligent driver who is the "at fault" party for the car accident, shall be responsible to compensate you for the caused injuries. However, if you have collision coverage, you can decide to seek compensation from the insurer. In any case, the right option for you is to file a notification with the negligent driver as you can later decide that the best option for you is to seek compensation from him. If you have optional collision insurance, the insurer is obliged to pay the costs of repairing the vehicle, regardless of the fact who is the liable party in the accident. This kind of insurance is not mandatory under California law; however, many drivers obtain it. The insurer afterward is eligible to seek reimbursement from the other driver who is at fault of the accident. In case you do not have collision coverage, you have several options to decide on:

• Pay for repairment yourself and seek reimbursement,
• Settle the claim directly with the liable driver in case the latter does not have insurance,
• Sue the liable driver and seek compensation personally.

Reporting the accident to your insurance company can be mandatory under numerous policies. Also, not reporting the accident to the California Department of Motor Vehicles can even lead to criminal liabilities.

How to Prove the Existence of Property Damages?

The best solution for proving property damages is the collection of necessary evidence. This can be:

• Photos of the damaged vehicle,
• Details of witnesses of the accident, if there were any,
• Write everything about the accident as soon as possible to fix each and every piece of information which can be further used.

The insurance shall determine who was liable for the accident based on the photos, testimonies of witnesses, reparation estimates, police report of the accident, etc.

Your Car's Value and Repair Costs

An insurer's only legal obligation is to compensate you for damages up to the value of your vehicle. If you've received a couple of repair estimates and it appears that the cost of repairs will exceed the value of your car, your insurer may declare it a total loss. In this case, you have the right to receive:

• Actual cash value of your vehicle-the reasonable amount which is necessary to replace your vehicle with a comparable used one,
• Replacement cash value-the value to replace your vehicle with a comparable new one.

To get the most available amount of compensation for the damages, you will definitely need professional legal advice.

What if You Caused the Damage to Your Vehicle?

If you caused damage to your own vehicle – for example, by driving off the road or colliding with a tree or fence. You'd have to pay for it yourself or file a claim against your own collision coverage, if you have it. If the damage isn't severe, you may want to pay for repairs yourself rather than through your own policy's coverage. This could raise your car insurance premium and cost you more money in the long run.

Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of another's negligence, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

Air pollution in scientific literature is usually defined as "releasing pollution into the air, which can be detrimental to human health and the planet as a whole. WHO data shows that air pollution kills over seven million people worldwide every year, thus it is a major threat to the health of people and the climate of the earth. This causes the USA as a whole and the states to develop legal regulations for air pollution control and punishment of air pollutants. The Clean Air Act authorizes the US Environmental Protection Agency to protect public health with the help of regulating the emissions of harmful air pollutants. In California, Health and Safety Code lists the actions which are considered unlawful from the perspective of air pollution. The appropriate sections are 2400, 42400.1, 42400.2, 42400.3, 42400.3.5, 42400.4, which will further be examined throughout this article. Any violation of a section is a misdemeanor.

Health and Safety Code 42400 HS

This section is the general provision, which considers the violation of law designed to protect the quality of the State's air by an entity as an offense. Penalties for violation of this section Under the corresponding section, the entity can be using these punishments:

• Imposition of a fine of not more than 5000$
• Imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months.

Health and Safety Code 42400.1 HS

This section regulates that it is an offense to emit any air contaminant negligently, which may violate state laws or other relevant regulations. Penalties for violation of this section Under relevant legal regulations, the committed actions shall include punishment by:

• Imprisonment in a county jail for up to 9 months
• Imposition of a maximum fine of not more than 25000$.

Health and Safety Code 42400.2

This section states that it is a crime for the defendant to emit an air contaminant in violation of state laws, and to commit the action knowingly. Penalties for violation of this section The violation of section 42400.2 charges the party and includes these punishments:

• Imprisonment in a county jail for a term up to 1 year,
• A maximum fine of 40.000$.

Health and Safety Code, 42400.3.

Under this section, it is a crime for the accused person or an entity:

• To emit an air contaminant in violation of the state law,
• To commit those actions willfully and intentionally (that said-on purpose).

Penalties applied for violation of this section The punishment of the violations of section 42400.3 includes :

• Imprisonment in a county jail for a term up to one year
• Imposition of a maximum fine of 75000$.

Health and Safety Code 42400.3.5.

Under the mentioned section, it is considered to be a crime for the defendant to:

• Knowingly violate state law regarding air pollution, according to the Clean Air Act.

Penalties applied for violation of this section The punishment of the violations of the mentioned section includes:

• Custody in a county jail for up to 6 months
• Maximum fine of 10.000$.

Health and Safety Code 42400.4

This Section is a part of the programs of the Environmental Protection Agency of the US, namely Title V permit programs, which issue permits to the entities to help limit the emissions of air contaminants. Penalties for violation of the relevant section No imprisonment as a penalty applies to the above-mentioned section. The accused shall be subject to the imposition of a fine in the amount of not exceeding 10000$. Are there any defenses to overcome penalties imposed by the relevant regulations of law?

• It is possible to use the fact that the violation was not conducted by the level of intent mentioned by the relevant section of the law. For example, as stated in section 42400.2, 42400.3 HS-knowingly, intentionally, or willfully.
• You can also claim that you applied to the corrective actions mentioned in the section. For example, you commit violations of legislative regulations, however afterward you conducted actions to stop emissions.

Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer

If you have any questions, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

One of the different varieties of an assault- defined under California law as an attempt by a person to cause significant injury to the victim, is assault with caustic chemicals. Particularly, the assault entails throwing, placing, and causing the placement of special chemicals. Specifically, "caustic chemicals, corrosive substances, flammable substances, vitriol" on the victim with a particular intent to injure, to cause harm, to disfigure the victim.

The Instrument of the Crime

As the description of the crime shows, instruments are caustic chemicals, flammable substances, corrosive substances, vitriol, etc. Let's examine the types of chemicals. The characteristics of caustic chemicals are the ability to burn and corrode a living tissue of the victim (skin, eyes, nose, mouth, etc). Examples of such caustic chemicals are hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, etc. Vitriol is the name that identifies sulfuric acid and its constituents. Flashpoint is the lowest temperature at which a liquid's vapor can ignite. Section 244 also applies to flammable substances that have a flashpoint of 150 degrees or less Fahrenheit.

Willful or Malicious Act

To obtain a conviction, the prosecutor must be able to prove all of the elements of the crime listed in CALCRIM 877 Jury Instructions beyond a reasonable doubt.

• By throwing, or causing to be thrown, you acted willfully and maliciously
• On someone, a caustic chemical, corrosive substance, or flammable substance
• With the intent of injuring their flesh or deforming their appearance
• You weren't acting in self-defense or in the best interests of others
• In practice, this means that not every incident in which caustic chemicals are thrown or placed on another person is illegal

An accidental application of chemicals, even if it outcomes in serious injuries, is not a violation of Section 244, as you might expect. More unusual circumstances, such as the intentional use of a qualifying chemical for a legitimate purpose like medical treatment, would not qualify. The defendant must act with the intent to cause harm to the victim.

Intent

Intent to cause harm by use of caustic chemicals is another mandatory element to criminalize actions under section 244 of the California Penal Code. Let's examine the following situation. A robber attacks me in the building. I grab a bottle full of liquid from the floor and pours it onto the robber's face. I had the intent to distract the robber and ran away. However, the bottle contained an acid, which burned the eyes of the robber. In this case, we can say that the act was done on purpose - though not willingly. There was no intention of using the chemical acid to disfigure or injure the robber. Section 244 of the California Penal Code does not make the act illegal. In another example, a girl is very jealous of her pretty neighbor who everyday wears a new and expensive dress. One day she argues with her and pours a chemical on her, screaming that she does not deserve that luxurious life. In this case, it is obvious that there has been an intent to cause harm to the victim and a willful act expressed by pouring the chemical.

Penalties for violations of section 244 of the Penal Code

Assault with caustic chemicals is a felony offense. Penalties for the actions are imprisonment in state prison for two, three, or four years or a fine in the amount of up to 10.000$. A judge can also sentence the defendant to felony probation. Probation may usually include imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 1 year. As well as other negative legal consequences for the defendant. The latter must pay a fine to the victims as well as face other restrictions. Paying restitution to the victim, meeting with the probation officer on a regular basis, and staying away from and not harassing the victim are all requirements.

Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of another's negligence, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

Every time a driver gets behind the wheel, there is a possibility of getting into an accident. Essentially, it is a risk most people end up taking on a day-to-day basis. Nevertheless, it appears that young drivers have a higher risk of causing traffic accidents than others. According to the CDC, the risk of auto accidents is higher among teens between 16–19 than among any other age group. In fact, per mile driven, teen drivers between 16-19 are nearly three times as likely as drivers aged 20 or older to be in a fatal car accident. The number one cause for car accidents is not always as simple as speeding or drinking and driving, however, they are probable causes as well. In fact, many believe that inexperience and lack of knowledge are some of the leading causes of such accidents.

Teen Drivers and Factors to Consider

Some factors for car accidents among younger drivers include:

• Speeding
• Drinking and driving
• Distracted driving
• Lack of experience

With these factors in mind, let's understand why these four key points are leading causes of accidents involving new or younger drivers.

Younger Drivers and Speeding

The idea of speeding crosses the mind of many new drivers. With the freedom to drive on their own, new and younger drivers feel the urge to test their limits. By doing so, they risk their own lives along with the lives of other drivers and pedestrians. Many people think that because they are young, they will never experience serious injuries in an accident. A concerning difficulty that parents face is their child's perception of invincibility. As a result, many new drivers speed and drive recklessly. The truth is, speeding makes it more likely to get involved in an accident and sustain an injury. This often results in greater accident rates among new and younger drivers than experienced drivers.

Younger Drivers and Driving Under the Influence

As we all know, driving under any sort of drug or alcohol consumption is not permitted under any circumstance. With this being said, there are still a number of drivers who go behind the wheel and get into accidents. Driving under the influence puts everyone around you at risk of being endangered. New and younger drivers frequently consume alcoholic beverages or use drugs prior to driving. Despite all the anti-drunk driving programs made to raise awareness, drunk driving is still a problem. People's perception of driving is affected when they consume alcohol before driving. The result is having slower response times and making wrong decisions, which can lead to severe personal injuries in accidents.

Distracted Driving

With technology being a very important factor in everyone's lives today, we often get distracted by them when we shouldn't be. For example, if you were to receive an urgent text at the time you are driving, would you pick up your phone to read and respond? Well, if you responded yes to that example, you are one example of a danger on the road. To avoid getting distracted from the text, wait for a clearance to pull over and reply. By doing so, you may save someone's life, better yet, maybe even yours. Texting is just one common example of getting distracted while on the road. Driving while being distracted removes the mind, eyes, and hands from our present driving.

Inexperienced Drivers

Over time, every driver becomes aware of ways to handle their vehicle. Becoming familiar with the car, how it runs, and how you react in certain situations while driving is important things to consider. This expertise comes with practice. Let's also remember that consistently switching up cars can be dangerous due to the fact that the size, rear-view mirrors, gas, and brake pedals operate just a little differently from one vehicle to another. In simpler terms, you have to drive to become a better driver.

Know-How to Reduce the Risks of a New or Young Driver Getting Into An Accident

If you or someone you know is driving with the intention of putting everyone around them in danger, here is what you can do to help them.

• For a new or younger driver, set a curfew. Driving while the sun is setting is very dangerous. If you are driving towards the sun especially, it could distract you from seeing the road on which you are driving on. You also not be able to see the car in front of you. Of course, there is a sun shield for the front two seats of the car, however, there is a certain time of day where that doesn't cover your eyes. To add, driving in complete darkness is also dangerous in the sense where other vehicle headlights may be too overpowering and blind your eyes for the time being that they are near you.
• By taking more driving lessons with their driving instructor, the driver will excel in every factor to drive a vehicle. It will help them feel safer as they are driving as well.
• Speeding trackers are a great way to restrict and keep tabs on the new or young driver. By doing so, it may limit the driver from driving irresponsibly.

Glendale Accident Attorney

If you have been in an accident with such a driver, don't be afraid to call our firm now. We can help assist you with your case. To reach our office, call {meta.phoneFormatted}.

A wrongful birth lawsuit is a type of medical malpractice where mother, who gives birth to a child who has a disease or disability, files a lawsuit. The disability is not one that occurs during labor and delivery, as it is in wrongful death cases. Doctors are not liable as they fully informed the parents about the degree of the child's injury. Parents of children born with birth defects or diseases can sue the hospital or a healthcare professional in wrongful birth lawsuits. Parents can also file a claim if genetic counseling misled them about the chances of a fetus developing abnormally.

Essential Factual Elements of Wrongful Birth

The California Supreme Court recognized the following general factors of a wrongful birth claim: the doctor failed to inform new parents the danger of having a child with a genetic or anatomical condition; the doctor's negligence caused the injury. According to CACI 512 to establish this claim of a wrongful birth, the plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements:

• The defendant negligently failed to diagnose or warn the plaintiff of the risk that the child would be born with a genetic impairment or disability
• The defendant negligently failed to perform appropriate tests or advise tests to the plaintiff
• The child was born with a genetic impairment or disability
• The plaintiff had known of the genetic impairment or disability; the mother would not have conceived the child or would not have carried the fetus to term
• Due to the defendant's negligence, plaintiff will need to pay extraordinary expenses to care for the child.

When Can You File a Wrongful Birth Lawsuit?

In their accusations, some families claim that a qualified doctor misdiagnosed their kid before birth. Others accuse genetic counselors of underestimating the risk of a child developing abnormally inside the womb. This is a common accusation when one of the child's parents has a hereditary genetic disorder. Usually, the lawsuits are filed following the birth of a child with Down Syndrome, cystic fibrosis, holoprosencephaly, or spina bifida. These injuries are often detectable by sonogram and ultrasound or by some sort of lab test. The lab technician, ultrasound operator or radiologist must observe the child's condition and inform the obstetrician, who must notify the parents. After that the parents can decide whether they want to continue on with the pregnancy.

Wrongful Birth Suit Damages

Parents who properly litigate for wrongful birth may be granted monetary damages to help defray the costs of caring for a kid with birth abnormalities. In wrongful birth cases, parents can be entitled to a financial compensation to cover items such as:

• Medical costs of caring for a child with a serious birth defect or disease
• Costs of tuition for special schools for children with different disabilities.
• Emotional distress experienced the parents in living with the child's birth defect or disease

This financial compensation is not aimed to cover the costs related to the raising of a child. It will only cover the costs that are specific to child born with a birth defect or disease.

Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of another's negligence, then you may be entitled to compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. A wrongful life lawsuit is an extremely complex legal process in which plaintiffs are suing doctors who allegedly failed to inform them about birth defects in their unborn child before they gave consent for the pregnancy to continue. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

16028(a) VC states that "upon the demand of a peace officer...any person who drives a motor vehicle on a highway must show proof of current auto insurance for the vehicle at the time the demand is made." A ticket for not having insurance in California is a violation. Offenders will be issued a ticket and will be required to pay a fine ranging from $100 to $200.

What Are the Minimum Requirements of Insurance?

Insurances have different minimum requirements. It is important to note and understand such requirements for private passenger vehicles. The list of minimum requirements of insurance are as follows:

• 15,000 for a single persons injury/death
• $30,000 for multiple person's injury/death
• $5,000 for property damage

Note: liability insurance compensates a person for property damage and/ or personal injury, VC 16028 requirements are not satisfied by comprehensive or collision insurance as well as med pay. Also, California does not require uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage to be carried by a driver For motorists who cannot afford insurance, they may be eligible for the Low-Cost Automobile Insurance Program, information can be found at mylowcostauto.com or via phone at 966-602-8861 Auto Insurance Fraud- If a person carries another state's insurance due to lower rates. If the fraud is committed, the driver license of the person may be revoked or suspended, drivers insurance will be canceled, and the driver may face time in county jail

What If One Does Not Have Proof of Insurance?

• The person will be charged with an infraction
• For a first offense-there will be a charge between $100 and $200
• For subsequent offenses-there will be a charge between $200 and $500

According to vehicle code 16028, proof of liability insurance must be carried by drivers at any given time they get behind the wheel. Proof of insurance must be displayed:

• When a police officer asks
• If an accident occurs
• When the person registers/ renews their car
• When the drivers car gets inspected

Police officers cannot stop a person just to request proof of insurance, however, they can if they have other justifications for stopping the vehicle. A person can prove they have insurance by providing the insurance card given by the insurance company, if they have an authorized letter from the California DMV stating that the driver has made a cash deposit or is self- insured, if they have a California Proof of Insurance Certificate(SR-22) , if there is evidence that the vehicle is owned or leased by a public entity, as well as if there is a Notification of Alternative Forms of responsibility(REG 5085) or a Statement of Facts(REG 256) form.

Can One Carry Insurance from Another State While Residing in California?

If you move to a different state without informing your insurer, your insurer may refuse to honor your contract because you did not follow the terms of the agreement. Auto insurance rates vary by state, and purchasing out-of-state auto insurance to receive lower rates is considered insurance fraud and is punishable by law. Many people who live in two states simply get their insurance in the state where their vehicle is registered or where they spend the most time. To register your vehicle and obtain a license plate, you will need proof of insurance.

For Further Questions Regarding your Case...

If you or someone you may know has questions regarding such topics related to this article, please feel free to give our office a call to schedule a consultation. We would be more than happy to help guide you along the right path and your benefit for the case.

It's natural to feel stress and confusion of what to do after receiving an injury in a car accident or other type of accident. You may be coping with financial hardship in addition to the physical and emotional effects of your injury. Many people have lost income as a result of their inability to work, while also facing mounting medical expenditures. Therefore, if someone else's negligence caused the accident, you may be able to hold them liable for the financial losses.

What is the Collateral Source Rule?

It's a legal principle that's been around for centuries. Its goal is to safeguard persons who was received injures in car accidents. If a person is hurt, they are able to get all of the money they need as soon as possible. If a third party compensates said person, it should have no bearing on what the plaintiff pays. The rule performs two functions. The evidential function is the first one. Simply put, it is a rule that implicates the rules of evidence and ensures that the defendant will not be able to bring up third-party payments made to the plaintiff. The substantive function is the second. This pertains to a person's civil rights and obligations, as well as the victim's right to recover the damages. In other words, just because a victim has received compensation from a third party does not indicate that it will lessen their losses.

What is the Result of the Collateral Source Rule?

The collateral source rule states that any compensation received by an accident victim from a source other than the defendant in a personal injury case cannot be deducted from the defendant's final award. There are essentially two things that result from the collateral source rule, which are as follows:

• The rule stops the defendant from bringing up payments made by a third party for the plaintiff's injuries
• The rule protects the plaintiff's right to recover damages from the defendant.

What is an Example of Evidence that Cannot Be Used Under the Collateral Source Rule?

An example of those evidence includes:

• Payments from insurance companies who reserve the right to substitute to the rights of the plaintiff;
• Gratuitous sources; or
• Insurance companies who are unable to recover any of the money they paid the plaintiff.

Are There Any Exceptions to the Collateral Source Rule?

Yes, there are two exceptions to the collateral source rule, which are as follows:

• In a medical malpractice lawsuit, the healthcare provider can choose to introduce evidence of any amount payable as a benefit to the plaintiff as a result of the personal injury;
• If an insurance company has an agreement with a healthcare provider that the insurance company shall pay a reduced fee for services rendered to the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff's damages would be reduced to the amount the insurance company actually paid on the plaintiff's behalf.

Can a Subrogation Clauses Become an Issue for Purposes of the Collateral Source Rule?

Yes, subrogation clauses inserted in policy contracts of insurance companies may be an issue for purposes of the collateral source rule. The reason why is because a subrogation clause can help an insurance company recover the costs of the benefits it has paid the plaintiff after an accident.

Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorney

Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.

A minors' compromise and release hearing is required by California law if a child under the age of eighteen is injured and receives a monetary settlement from the at-fault party. This means that a guardian must be appointed by the court unless the child is legally emancipated, a judge must approve the settlement for your injured child, and the settlement funds must generally be deposited into a blocked account in any FDIC-insured bank, trust company, savings and loan associate, or similar financial institution located in the state of California, until the child is eighteen years of age. The settlement funds can also be invested in a vehicle like an insurance annuity contract (single-premium deferred annuity). Alternatively, you can have a portion of the funds deposited in a bank and a portion of the funds deposited in an investment vehicle. Please see other articles on this website for more information, or your child's injury lawyer can explain which method is best for depositing settlement funds.

California Court-Supervised Settlements for Injured Minors

According to California Probate Code Sections 2504,90 3500,91 3600,92 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 372.93, an enforceable settlement of a child's injury case can only be consummated with California court approval. The whole point of a court-supervised settlement for injured minors in California is to: Appoint a guardian to assist the minor child in monitoring his or her settlement funds.

• Ensure that the settlement is fair and equitable to the minor, and
• Obtain a court order in order to obtain the settlement funds
• Make certain that the minor receives the entirety of his or her settlement funds when he or she becomes an adult.

In California, the court process is the best way to approve and monitor a bodily injury settlement for a minor. After their child's injury was approved by the court and safely deposited into a bank account, parents approached me and asked me to petition the judge for an early release of a portion of the settlement funds that do not directly benefit the minor. Some parents forget that the entire California court process is designed to benefit their child directly because the settlement funds are the child's funds. Remember that an early release of settlement funds is possible, but it will be closely scrutinized by the courts and must benefit the minor child directly.

Settlement for Injuries to a Minor Child (Settlements Under $5

If the monetary settlement is less than $5,000, California Probate Code Sections 3611(d)94 and 340195 have routinely allowed custodial parents to manage the settlement funds directly on behalf of their minor children, avoiding the need for court approval. In fact, all of California's major insurance carriers routinely waive minors' compromise and release hearings when the settlement amount to the injured child is less than $5,000. The reason for the lack of a court approval requirement for settlements under $5,000 is that judges have the discretion to order the settlement funds for a minor child to be placed in a blocked account with withdrawals subject to court approval, or they can order it paid directly to the custodial parent(s).

Looking For An Attorney?

Are you looking for an attorney to help you with your case? Look no further, KAASS Law will be able to provide you great experience, knowledge and satisfaction. Fell free to call our office at {meta.phoneFormatted}.