- Read More
Breach of Covenant of Good Faith in California
Every contract and agreement in California contains an implied promise of good faith and fair dealing. This means that each party shouldn't do anything to unfairly interfere with the right of any other party for receiving benefits of the contract. Though, the implied promise of fair dealing and good faith can't create obligations that are inconsistent with the terms of the contract.Elements the Plaintiff Must Prove for Breach of Covenant of Good Faith in California
According to CACI 325, in a breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing action, a plaintiff must be able to prove all of the following elements:- Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract;
- Plaintiff did all or substantially all of the significant things that the contract required him to do or that he was excused from having to do those things;
- All conditions required for the defendant's performance had occurred or were excused;
- Defendant unfairly interfered with the plaintiff's right to receive the benefits of the contract; and
- Plaintiff was harmed by the defendant's conduct
What Is Insurance Bad Faith?
California law defines certain types of conduct and acts which can qualify as insurance bad faith. They include the following:- Unreasonable denying the policy benefits
- Intentionally misrepresenting policy provisions or facts to the claimants
- Failing to act or respond promptly with respect to the claim
- Failing to provide adequate and prompt justification for the denial of the claim
- Failing to approve or deny the claim within a reasonable time period
- Failing to make a good faith effort to honestly settle claims between parties
- Misleading a plaintiff as to the legal deadline for initiating a lawsuit and filing a claim
- Advising a plaintiff not to hire a lawyer
Insurance Contract Provisions
In California most insurance contracts contain the following provisions:- The insurer is required to pay claims when the policyholder experiences a potentially covered risk
- The insurer must investigate a claim for determining the liability for caused injury,
- The insurer must use good faith attempts to settle claims
- The insurer must provide the policyholder with a legal defense against third-party claims
Duty to Defend in Insurance Contracts
In California, insurers are required to indemnify and defend the policyholders in case a risk is even possibly covered, thus even if the reason for the accident is unknown, the insurer is obliged to treat it as a covered risk. On the other hand, the policyholder must act in good faith and comply with the notice requirements.Remedies for Insurance Bad Faith
There are a number of potential damages the plaintiff can recover if the insurer has committed bad faith.- Plaintiff can recover damages for breach of contract, specifically, the benefits due under the policy plus interest.
- Plaintiff may be able to recover bad faith damages, including consequential economic losses, attorneys' fees, and emotional distress and.
- According to California Civil Code Section 3294(a) punitive damages can only be awarded in case clear and convincing evidence shows the insurance company engaged in oppression, fraud, or malice.
- Read More
Forging or Altering a Prescription in California
Under California Business and Professions Code Section 4324 it is illegal to forge or alter a prescription, or possess drugs acquired through a false prescription.
Forging or Altering a Prescription in California
It is a crime in California to forge a prescription or make an attempt to gain possession of prescription drugs. However, in case a person actually got medication as a result of forging a prescription, he will be also liable under Business & Professions Code Section 4324(b). A person can be convicted of both offenses i.e. forging the prescription and obtaining the medication through false prescription.
To Be Convicted of California Business and Professions Code 4324 Forging or Altering a Prescription Prosecution Must Prove
The prosecution must prove the following elements to convict the defendant of forging or altering a prescription:
- defendant falsely made, forged altered, or counterfeited a prescription;
- gave another person a forged or fictitious signature;
- used or attempted to use with a forged or fictitious signature; and/or
- The defendant committed that act with the intent to defraud
Forging a Prescription
Prescription forgery is the use of a falsified prescription for purchasing drugs illegally. Forging or altering a prescription is making, publishing, uttering, passing, or attempting to pass a prescription for drugs or possessing drugs acquired by a false prescription. Attempting to transfer another person a falsified prescription, even if you didn't actually write it, is also a crime.
What is Considered to be a Prescription?
Prescription is an instruction to provide drugs, either by phone, through writing, or through electronic communications (i.e., facsimile). Generally, a valid prescription must include the following information:
- Patient's name
- Name and quantity of prescribed drug
- Directions on how to use the drug
- Date of issue
- Contact information of doctor or prescriber
- Doctor's or prescriber's signature
The Term "Drug" Under Business and Professions Code Section 4025
The term "drug" under California Business and Professions Code Section 4025 include:
- prescription drugs;
- veterinary drugs; and
- drugs that can be obtained without a prescription.
"Uttering" Under Business & Professions Code Section 4324
The defendant is guilty of falsely uttering a prescription in situations where the defendant:
- Used or attempted to use a forged drug prescription; and/or
- Conveyed or indicated through his words or conduct that the prescription was genuine
Defenses to Forged Prescription B&P Code 4324
Some common defenses to charges related to forged prescriptions
- The defendant had the authority to sign the prescription;
- Defendant did not forge or alter the prescription;
- Defendant did not use the forged prescription; and/or
- The defendant was not aware that the prescription was forged
Penalties for violating California Business and Professions Code Section 4324
Business and Professions Code section 4324 forging or altering a prescription is considered a "wobbler offense". As such, the offense can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the defendant's criminal history, as well as other factors.
Penalties for a Misdemeanor Business and Professions Code 4324 Conviction
Penalties for misdemeanor Business and Professions Code 4324 conviction include:
- Up to one year in county jail;
- A fine of up to $1,000; and/or
- Misdemeanor probation
Penalties for a Felony Business and Professions Code 4324 Conviction
Penalties for felony Business and Professions Code 4324 conviction include:
- 16 months, two or three years in county jail;
- A fine of up to $10,000; and/or
- Felony probation;
Furthermore, additional penalties a defendant can face include the following:
- Community service or labor;
- Permanent firearm restriction; and/or
- Immigration consequences;
- Read More
Damaging Phone, Electrical or Utility Lines PC 591
California Penal Code Section 591: Damaging Phone, Electrical or Utility Lines
Under California Penal Code Section 591 it is illegal to maliciously and purposely damage, obstruct, disconnect remove, or otherwise injure wires, cables, television, or any equipment that is used for a telephone, cable, or electric service. Often the crime of damaging phone, electrical, or utility lines is charged in combination with other offenses such as burglary or domestic violence. For committing this crime during an episode of domestic violence or burglary the defendant can face harsher charges than under California Penal Code Section 594 Vandalism.Elements of California PC 591
Prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that the defendant is guilty of this damaging phone, electrical or utility lines under PC Section 591:- Defendant illegally and maliciously took down, damaged, removed or obstructed a telephone, cable television or electrical line or mechanical equipment connected to the line, or
- Defendant illegally and maliciously severed a telephone, cable television or electrical line or
- Defendant illegally and maliciously made an unauthorized connection with a line used to conduct mechanical equipment or electricity connected to the line
Acting Maliciously
For the purposes of PC Section 591, acting maliciously means that defendant had the intention to injure another one or do an unlawful act while accessing the electrical, phone, or cable lines.Legal defenses for California Penal Code Section 591 Charges
- Accident
Penalties for Violating California Penal Code Section 591
In California law illegally and maliciously injuring electrical, cable or telephone lines is a wobbler and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the case facts and the defendant's criminal history. The prosecutor will also take into account the extent of damage and the reason for the defendant's actions.Penalties for a Misdemeanor Conviction of PC 591 Are the Following:
- Up to one year in a county jail
- A fine of up to 1,000
- Misdemeanor (summary) probation
Penalties for a Felony Conviction of PC 591 Are the Following:
- Felony (formal) probation;
- Sixteen months, two or three years in a county jail under California's realignment program;
- A fine of up to $10,000.
Crimes Related to California PC 591
- California Penal Code Section 594: Vandalism
- California Penal Code Section 243(e) (1): Domestic Violence
- California Penal Code Section 459: Burglary
- Read More
Bringing a Product Liability Lawsuit in California
The harms a person sustains as a result of a defective product are the focus of a product liability case. A medication, toy, electronic gadget, or anything else could be the product. The crucial factor is that the product must be faulty or malfunction in some way, causing harm to someone. There are regulations in place to give people legal remedies because unsafe and defective items injure thousands of people every year
Elements the Plaintiff Must Prove During a Product Liability Lawsuit
To win a case for products liability in California, the plaintiff has to be able to prove the following elements:
- Defendant designed, distributed, manufactured, or sold a defective product
- The product contained the defect when it left the defendant's possession
- Plaintiff used the product in a reasonably foreseeable manner
- As a result of the defect, the plaintiff suffered harm
Strict Product Liability in California
Usually, a defendant must have acted (or omitted to act) with gross negligence, recklessness, or malice in order to be held accountable for a plaintiff's injuries. However, in some cases, a defendant could be strictly accountable for the plaintiff's injuries even though they were not their fault.
Anyone who produces or sells a product that is riskier than it ought to be is in violation of California law. Strict liability exists for any injuries of using the product in a manner that is reasonably foreseeable, or that fails to provide adequate warnings.
Types of Claims Under Strict Product Liability
Liability claims for defective products can occur on the basis of negligence, strict liability, or a breach of the warranty of fitness. Because there is no federal products liability legislation, this will usually depend on the jurisdiction. Because of this lack of consistency, the US Department of Commerce published the Model Uniform Products Liability Act (MUPLA). Which attempts to promote uniform processes for the products liability tort.
There are essentially three types of claims under strict product liability:
- Manufacturing defect claims, which involve a defect in a specific item produced
- Design defect claims, which involve a defect in the design of an entire product line
- Failure to warn claims, which involve the defendant's liability
Manufacturing Defect Claims
In manufacturing defects claims, the plaintiff asserts that a specific product was defectively manufactured as compared to products in the same line. So, the product presented harm which actually was a result of the manufacturing defects.
Design Defect Claims
A lawsuit based on a product's poor design is the first sort of product liability claim. In a legal case based on defective design, the plaintiff claims that the product is inherently unsafe due to its design rather than a manufacturing error.
In California there are two tests used in assessing defective design product liability claims:
- The Risk-Benefit Test
According to this test, after the plaintiff shows that the defective product design caused the injuries, the burden of proof completely shifts to the defendant. The defendant must prove that the utility of the defective product design outweighs the risk of the design. If he fails to do that, then the plaintiff will win the case.
- The Consumer Expectations Test
According to this test, a product's design will be defective in case it fails to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect it to perform.
Failure to Warn Claim
According to California's strict product liability, a defendant who is aware that the consumer is using the product in a reasonably foreseeable manner. Will be eligible to warn the consumer of the risk of injury or harm if exposes him to a risk of injuries is eligible to warn the consumer of the risk of injury or harm.
The defendant can be liable for a failure to warn when such failure could have a different outcome. So, in case a typical consumer would have become aware of the risk of injuries or harm on his own, then the defendant can't be liable for failing to warn of an already-known hazard.
Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at {meta.phoneFormatted}.
- Read More
Conservatorship in California
Conservatorship is a court proceeding when a judge assigns an entity or individual to manage the financial affairs and exercise the legal rights of a mentally ill person.
The court refers to the person managing the legal rights and finances for the disordered person as the "conservator." The disabled person is known as the "conservatee".
In California, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act governs the involuntary treatment of the mentally ill person. The act has a goal ending the indefinite and inappropriate commitment of the mentally ill, providing adequate evaluation and treatment to a person with serious mental disorders, protecting and guaranteeing and public safety, and providing supervision, individualized treatment, and placement services for the disabled person through a conservatorship program.
Who Can Become a Conservator in California?
Usually, a conservator is a spouse, child, domestic partner, relative, friend, or neighbor of a disabled person. Although conservatorship law prefers a family member of the conservatee, in some cases the court can appoint professional conservators, government, or non-profits agencies.
Essential Factual Elements of Conservatorship
According to CACI 400 to succeed on the claim, the petitioner must be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt all of the following elements:
- The respondent has a mental disorder or is impaired by chronic alcoholism
- The respondent is gravely disabled as a result of the mental disorder or chronic alcoholism
- The respondent is unable or unwilling or unable voluntarily to accept meaningful treatment.
Types of Conservatorship
Probate Conservatorships
Probate conservatorships includes:
- General Conservatorships: This is a conservatorship of adults who aren't able to take care of themselves or their finances. Usually, these conservatees are elderly people, but there also can be younger people who have been seriously impaired, for example in a car accident.
- Limited Conservatorships. These conservatorships are for adults with developmental disabilities who are not able to fully care for themselves or their finances. This type of conservatorships doesn't need a higher level of care as in the case of general conservatorships.
Lanterman-Petris-Short Conservatorships
Lanterman-Petris-Short conservatorship is issued to care for adults who have serious mental health illnesses and need special care. This type of conservatorship is generally used for people who require extensive mental health treatment and need very restrictive living arrangements. Lanterman-Petris-Short conservatorships must be started by a local government agency.
Duties of Conservatorship
Conservators have multiple duties to perform for taking care of the conservatee's needs and here is the list of some duties a conservator may perform.
- Assessing the status of real estate and personal property
- Filing yearly plans for the conservatee's care
- Planning appropriate care for the conservatee and getting an appropriate residence for him
- Paying outstanding bills and filing income tax returns and for the conservatee
- Filing an inventory of the assets
How Are Conservatorships Terminated?
Typically, termination of the conservatorship happens when the conservatee passes away. In case the conservatee doesn't meet the standards for having a conservator, a court can cancel the appointment. Additionally, the conservatee can petition a court with the assistance of a conservatorship lawyer in case he believes he has strong evidence that he is better off without that care.
Conservatorship Versus Guardianship
In California, conservatorships are protective court procedures for adults, while guardianships protect minors.
- Read More
Filing an Injury Claim With an Insurance Company
Filing Injury Claims With Insurance Companies
Unfortunately, accidents and incidents can be unavoidable sometimes. It can happen to any innocent man or woman and anywhere, during a working day or a holiday. You can appear into a slip and fall accident or in an automobile accident in the most unexpected moment and suffer either property damages or personal injuries. One of the common ways to get a compensation is settling a personal injury claim with an insurance company. Insurance companies exist to protect people from different kind of unpredictable and undesired coincidences. Here is a list of several insurance companies operating in Los Angeles: Kemper, Alliance, Farmers, State Farm, Mercury, Safeco, Infiniti, Allstate, Progressive, Esurance etc. Every insurance company has its own policies, procedures and different suggestions. You can file an insurance claim for various types of scenarios. It depends on the type of your insurance and on the policies and procedures. In most cases some documentation must be done, and the terms must be strictly kept. Filing a claim with an insurance company can be a tough and time-consuming process full of uncertainty and tricky procedures. KAASS Law firms' attorneys are good professionals and experienced in such cases. They can be there to help and to provide you with deserved outcomes.Who Can Claim Compensation and How?
You should carefully read your insurance contract in order to reveal who can apply for compensation and who can be compensated. There are different insurance packages. You can have an Insurance that only covers your personal injuries, or your family member's injuries can be included under the coverage too. That's why it is very important to carefully examine the contract. You can can file a claim with your insurance company either personally or via law firms and/or attorneys. As was mentioned above, claiming procedure may include several terms and conditions in addition to plenty of documentation. It is important to know, that you need to introduce the accurate calculation of the financial losses caused by the accident. While there are some punitive damages that you could calculate yourself, such as lost wages and current medical charges, there are others that you may find practically impossible without the help of an attorney. These include the value of your pain and suffering, in addition to lost capacity of making money. Once you have dealt with all the medical affairs that may arise out of such an undesirable event, you may need to operate a personal injury claim with an insurance company to receive compensation for such injuries.Insurance Companies Generally Aim to Reduce Expenses
Insurance companies aim to help their insureds in the times of trouble, but like any business, they are trying to lessen your costs and expenses under their coverage to compensate less. It means they can save markedly in the amounts they have to pay to the insured. In these cases, dealing with insurance companies may even become confusing to a lawyer, let alone to a person without any legal discipline at all. The personal injury lawyers must know the rules, too. They must understand the guidelines and the terms. Additionally; these will include different filing procedures for claims against insurance companies. KAASS Law firm's personal injury lawyers are experienced in such cases and they can assist you. They can help in the validity of the potential claim. They can ensure that the time limit, in your case, is met and the necessary documentation is done. This paperwork plays a huge role in such kind of processes and is a mandatory part of success. - Read More
Federal Drug Trafficking
Federal Drug Trafficking Law US Code 21 Section 841
Federal drug trafficking law US Code 21 Section 841 states that it is unlawful to knowingly and intentionally manufacture, dispense, distribute, or possess the intention to manufacture, distribute or dispense a controlled substance; or distribute, create, dispense or possess with the intention to dispense or distribute the counterfeit substance.Elements of Federal Drug Trafficking Crimes Under US Code 21 Section 841
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements to convict the defendant of federal drug trafficking:- The defendant had the specific intent to traffic drugs.
- The defendant had knowledge that he was transporting drugs
Counterfeit Substance
A counterfeit substance is a controlled substance that has the container or labeling of any trademark, identifying mark, trade name, number, imprint, device, or any likeness thereof, of a manufacturer, dispenser, or distributor or without authorization.Federal Drug Crime Charges
The defendant is likely to be charged with a federal drug crime in case the criminal activity:- Happened on federal property
- Involved importing drugs into the US or crossed state lines
- Was related to a continuing criminal enterprise or an organized crime
- Involved the sale of a large amount of drug
- Involved transporting drugs through mail couriers such as FedEx, USPS, and UPS.
Simple Possession and Possession With the Intent to Distribute
Small amounts of drugs can be considered to be for personal use, and are often handled by local and state officials. But, in case the defendant is involved with larger amounts of drugs with the intent to distribute, his case is more likely to be handled by federal authorities.Penalties for Federal Drug Trafficking
The judge considers the following factors when determining the defendant's sentence:- Defendant's criminal history
- The type of drugs
- The quantity of drugs
- Whether or not the drug caused death or serious bodily injury to another person
- 1 kg or more of heroin
- 5 kg or more of cocaine
- 280 g or more of crack
- 50 g or more of pure methamphetamines (500 g of meth mixture).
- 10 g or more of LSD
- 100 g or more of pure PCP
- 1000 kg or more of marijuana;
Penalties for Smaller Amounts of Drugs
The defendant will also face a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years in federal prison for smaller amounts of drugs.- 100 g or more of heroin
- 28 g or more of crack
- 100 kg or more of marijuana
- 5 g or more of pure methamphetamines (50 g of meth mixture)
- 500 g or more of cocaine
- 10 g or more of pure PCP
- 1 g or more of LSD
Penalty Enhancement for Federal Drug Trafficking
The defendant will face harsher penalties in case he carried a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, was trafficking drugs near a federal facility or school, or used a minor under the age of 18 in drug operations. Are you or someone you know in need of legal assistance regarding federal drug trafficking charges? Get in touch with KAASS Law in order to see what we can do for you. Your Name (required) Your Phone Number (required) Preferred Time to Contact You Back Your Email Subject Your Message By checking this button I consent to the terms and conditions of KAASS Law. - Read More
Anti-Kickback Statute [42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)]
Anti-Kickback Statute 42 US Code Section 1320a-7b(b)
According to the Anti-Kickback Statute 42 US Code Section 1320A-7B(B), it is prohibited to knowingly and willfully offer, solicit, pay, or receive anything of value which create any type of reward for referring patients to, recommending or arranging any type of purchase that falls under the payment made by health care benefit programs.
The statute covers both the payers of kickbacks-those who pay or offer remuneration and the recipients of kickbacks-those who receive or solicit remuneration.
Examples of Illegal Remuneration:
Illegal remuneration includes anything of value and can take many forms besides cash, such as:
- Expensive hotel stays and meals free rent
- Compensation for medical consultancies or directorships.
- Bribes
- Rebate
- Gifts
- Below market rent or lease agreements
- Discounts
- Services or equipment provided at below the market price
Safe Harbor
There are safe harbor regulations that protect certain payment and business practices that could otherwise implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute from criminal and civil prosecution. The safe harbor regulations put definitions of these practices to make them lawful for medical providers. The regulations must be exactly met with no exceptions to qualify for safe harbor protection.
Some Examples of Safe Harbor Regulations:
- Certain discounts and price reductions
- Employment relationships
- Fair market value compensation
- Group purchasing arrangements and organizations
- In-office ancillary services
- Incidental benefits
- Isolated transactions
- Non-monetary compensation
- Personal service arrangements
- Physician services
Kickbacks in Health Care Can Lead To:
- Overutilization
- Increased program costs
- Corruption of medical decision making
- Patient steering
- Unfair competition
Anti-Kickback Statute Penalties
Though the Anti-Kickback Statute is a criminal statute, it provides both civil and criminal penalties for violations.
The criminal penalties are the following:
- A fine of up to $25,000
- Five years in federal prison
Additionally, the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services can pursue:
- False Claims Act liability
- Civil penalties of up to $50,000 for a violation
- Three times the amount of any government overpayment.
Sometimes penalties for Anti-Kickback violations also include a period of debarment or exclusion from participation in Medicaid, Medicare, and all other federal programs which provide health benefits.
Differences Between the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law
Anti-Kickback Statute the Stark Law are the two main federal statutes that deal with remuneration related to improper referrals. Though the two laws are similar, there are several differences between the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute.
- Anti-Kickback Statute includes both criminal and civil penalties when the Stark Law is exclusively a civil enforcement statute.
- Anti-Kickback Statute applies to Medicare and any other federal healthcare program when the Stark Law applies only to Designate Health Services paid for by Medicare.
- Anti-Kickback Statute applies to any referral source when a violation of the Stark Law involves a relationship between and an entity and a physician.
- For violating the Anti-Kickback Statute the element of intent must be present when the Stark Law is a strict liability statute.
- Read More
Federal Embezzlement Laws
Federal embezzlement laws are broken down by the type of stolen property and money. Here is a short description of each category mentioned in 18 U.S.C Chapter 31, and the associated penalties.
18 U.S.C. § 641 Public Money, Property, or Records
Under 18 U.S.C. § 641 it is prohibited to embezzle property, money, records, or anything else of value that belongs to the United States government or one of its agencies.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C § 641 Offenses
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 641 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 641 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 642 Tools and materials for counterfeiting purposes
Under 18 U.S.C. § 642 it is prohibited to embezzle tools, printing devices, stamps, or other implements used to create currency notes, federal bonds, certificates, postage stamps, coupons, or other item authorized to be put into circulation by the federal government.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 642 Offenses:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
18 U.S.C. § 643 Accounting Generally for Public Money
Under 18 U.S.C. § 643 it is prohibited to embezzle public money by federal officers, agents or employees.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 643 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 643 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or a sum equal to the amount embezzled
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 643 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 644 Receiving Unauthorized Deposit of Public Money
18 U.S.C. § 644 applies to embezzlement by a person who receives and keeps public funds that don't belong to him.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 644 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 644 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or a sum equal to the amount embezzled
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 644 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 648 and 649 Custodians Misusing Public Funds
Under 18 U.S.C. § 648 and 649, it is prohibited to embezzle either by keeping or failing to promptly deposit federal money by any person charged with the safekeeping of federal money.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 648 and 649 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § §648 and 649 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or an up to the amount embezzled
In case the 18 U.S.C. § §648 and 649 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 650 Depositaries Failing to Safeguard Deposits
18 U.S.C. § 650 addresses the embezzlement by the United States Treasurer, an employee of the treasury, or any other public federal depository.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 650 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 650 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or an up to the amount embezzled
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 650 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 653 Disbursing Officer
18 U.S.C. § 653 addresses embezzlement by any federal officer or employee who is charged with disbursing public money.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 653 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 653 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or a up to the amount embezzled
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 653 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 655 Theft by a Bank Examiner
This section addresses embezzlement by federal public bank examiners and assistant examiners when the money embezzled is taken from a banking institution which is a member of the Federal Reserve System, insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, is an agency or branch of a foreign bank.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 655 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 655 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000 or an up to the amount embezzled
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 655 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 657 Embezzlement by Employees of a Bank, Credit, Lending, or Insurance Institution
This section prohibits embezzlement by an employee of any banking credit, lending, or insurance institution the Federal Reserve Act, or by a Federal Reserve employee.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 657 Offenses:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 657 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to thirty years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $1,000,000
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 657 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 658 Property Mortgaged or Pledged to Farm Credit Agencies
Under 18 U.S.C. § 658 it is prohibited to embezzle property or money pledged to or held by a farm credit agency as security for a farm loan.
Penalties 18 U.S.C. § 658:
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 658 offense involves $1,000 or more:
- Up to five years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
In case the 18 U.S.C. § 658 offense involves $1,000 or less:
- Up to one year in jail
- A fine of up to $100,000
18 U.S.C. § 663 Solicitation or Use of Gifts
According to this Section, it is prohibited to solicit a gift of money or other property on behalf of the United States Federal government or one of its agencies with the intent to keep that gift or to embezzle donated property or money.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 663 Offenses:
- Up to five years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
18 U.S.C. § 664 Embezzlement From an Employee Benefit Plan
Embezzling from any employee benefit plan.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 664 Offenses:
- Up to five years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
18 U.S.C. § 666 Theft or Bribery Concerning Programs Receiving Federal Funds:
This section defines embezzlement by employees of organizations receiving $10,000 or more in federal grants, subsidies, contracts, guarantees, loans insurance, or other forms of federal assistance in one year period.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 666 Offenses:
In case the offense involves $5,000 or more:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
18 U.S.C. § 667 Theft of Livestock
This section defined the embezzlement of money, livestock, or any other property worth $10,000 or more, which is connected with marketing or selling livestock in foreign or interstate commerce.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 667 Offenses:
- Up to five years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
18 U.S.C. § 668 Theft of Major Artwork
According to 18 U.S.C. § 668, it is prohibited to obtain or steal by fraud artwork or other items from a museum when the art is worth at least $5,000 and is over one hundred years old or worth at least $100,000.
Penalties for 18 U.S.C. § 668 Offenses:
- Up to ten years in federal prison
- A fine of up to $250,000
- Read More
Animal Abuse Laws in California
California Penal Code 597 (PC 597) Animal Abuse
According to the animal abuse law California Penal Code Section 597 (PC 597), it is illegal to maliciously and intentionally mutilate, maim, wound, torture, or kill an animal.
More specifically, it is prohibited to:
- Overload, overdrive, or overwork an animal
- Tormentor torture an animal
- Impose needless cruelty upon an animal
- Deprive an animal of necessary sustenance, shelter or drink
- Subject an animal to unnecessary suffering
- Beat, mutilate or kill an animal
- Drive, ride, or use an animal when unfit for labor
- Abuse an animal in any other manner.
Under this animal abuse law in California, it is also prohibited to maliciously or intentionally maiming, torturing mutilating or a bird, reptile, amphibian, mammal, or fish that is protected or endangered species.
Elements of Crime Under California Animal Abuse Law PC 597
To convict the defendant under California Penal Code Section 597, the prosecutor must prove that he acted maliciously, intentionally, or cruelly when committing the act of animal abuse.
Legal Defenses to California PC 597 Animal Abuse Charges
Self-defense or defense of others
The defendant can fight a PC Section 597 charge in case he injured or killed an animal for the purposes of protecting himself, another person, or even another animal. The defendant must present the evidence that he acted reasonably given the circumstances of the incident.
Accident
A defendant can fight a PC Section 597 charge in case the animal's injury or death was an accident and wasn't the result of any intentional plan, maliciousness, cruelty, or gross negligence.
False Accusation
There are plenty of reasons when a person can be falsely charged with a PC Section 597 violation. It can be mistaken identity or a purposeful accusation of another person of animal abuse.
Penalties for Violating California Animal Abuse Law PC 597
California PC Section 597 Animal Abuse can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the defendant's criminal history and the facts of the case and.
Penalties for a Misdemeanor Conviction of PC 597 Animal Abuse:
- Up to one in a county jail
- A fine of to $20,000
Penalties for a Felony Conviction Are the Following:
- Sixteen months, two, or three years in the California state prison
- A fine of to $20,000
In case the animal abuse involved the use of a deadly weapon, the judge can extend the sentence by an additional year.
Moreover, the conviction for Penal Code Section 597 PC violation may result in additional consequences, such as mandatory counseling or the animals being permanently removed from the defendant's custody. The defendant can also face occupational and professional license restrictions, immigration consequences, loss of rights to own firearms, and more.
Crimes Related to California Penal Code Section 597
- Cockfighting – California PC Section 597 (b)
- Dogfighting – California PC Section 597.5
- Leaving an Animal in an Unattended Vehicle – California PC Section PC 597.7
- Sexually Abusing an Animal – California PC Section 5
- Selling an Animal on the Street – California PC Section 597.4
- Poisoning an Animal – California PC Section 596